Was 9-11 a CIA Nuke Assault On Ourselves?
By James Donahue
The public reaction and battery of media-driven propaganda that followed the 9-11 attacks were so powerful that those of us who doubted the story didn’t dare speak out for fear of being deemed “one of them.”
We had our doubts even as we watched the twin towers and then building seven come crashing down. There was mass confusion. What we were watching clearly appeared to us as a professional “implosion” that had nothing to do with the aircraft that struck them. But we didn't start putting the pieces together until much later after professional engineers began studying the images.
I began expressing myself on my old website then hosted by Yahoo and paid dearly for daring to question the government’s official story. Yahoo web engineers shut me out of my site and forced me to find a new host and start over. There was no way for me to prove the politics behind the shut-out, but it happened. That is how sensitive the emotions among the American people were during the weeks and months that followed that dreadful attack.
To this day most people in the U.S. are finding it hard to accept the mounting evidence that 9-11 might have been an inside red flag job designed to turn our heads from some very questionable events going on in Washington and the Pentagon and give the Bush Administration the excuse to launch two ugly (but very profitable) wars in the Middle East.
Like the events surrounding the 1963 Kennedy Assassination the conspiracy theories concerning the 9-11 attacks have been so common and the government response so silent that most Americans stand confused and uncertain about what to really believe. In both cases we had internal government sanctioned “investigations” that drafted official reports as to what happened. And a large number of folks have subsequently reached a point where they wonder if they can trust anything their government tells them.
For example, I remember watching a televised news story and watching a video clip of what they told us was Osama bin Laden, the so-called leader of an al-Qaeda network of trained Islamic terrorists, claiming responsibility for the September 11 attacks. If you “Google” search bin Laden you can easily find reports that he confessed to planning and ordering the attacks. But in the video we were shown bin Laden was sitting at some wilderness bunker, speaking in his own language, and a U.S. news reporter was interpreting what he was allegedly saying. People who have since studied the video now say the man in the picture was someone that looked like bin Laden but was not the real guerrilla leader. Some say bin Laden actually denied any links with the U.S. attack, and he did this several times. There appears to be no official record proving that bin Laden or his trained terrorist organization had anything to do with the 9-11 attacks.
Yet it was that confession that supported George W. Bush’s terrible decision to order a military strike against Afghanistan. Just over a year later Bush ordered another assault against Iraq.
Neither war was justified. Osama bin Laden was a native of Saudi Arabia. The alleged pilots that flew the aircraft into the twin towers and the Pentagon on 9-11 were allegedly from Saudi Arabia. The attack was allegedly plotted in Kandahar, Afghanistan by a gang that had no apparent political affiliations with Afghanistan. A U.S. Navy Seal team allegedly found and killed bin Laden in his hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011 and his body was conveniently dumped overboard at sea. For some yet unexplained reason U.S. troops attacked the entire country of Afghanistan after 9-11 and that war is still going on after over 14 years. We are apparently still at war there against the Taliban, a militant group that has had control over that country but as far as we can tell was not part of the al-Qaeda movement. At least from the start. Why?
The Bush war in Iraq turned out to be predicated on a lie. Mr. Bush and several key members of his cabinet all told us they had proof that Iraqi President Sadam Hussein was harboring “weapons of mass destruction.” Hussein denied the charge and in the end, it turned out that Hussein was right, the story was a fabricated lie. Hussein had no alliance with bin Laden and the al-Qaeda terrorists either. The Iraq war also continues and U.S. involvement cannot seem to end. After we captured and led Hussein to the gallows, the country fell into civil war. The U.S. invested heavily in Iraq and helped establish that country's now failing government. Our troops remain there on an "advisory" and defensive nature. We may never leave.
This commentary was inspired by a lengthy report by Paul Kincaid on Press Core. Kincaid states why he believes the 9-11 attacks were the planned work of our own government and that uranium powered underground detonations were used. http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911.html
Kincaid’s report explains in great detail why he believes this to be true. He points out that the aircraft that struck the towers were being remotely controlled from a ground tower, that we had the technology to remotely control and fly aircraft in 2001, and that the fuel in those planes would not have topple the towers. He points out that structural engineers from all over the world agree that it would have been impossible for an aircraft to have accomplished such a fete.
The story reminds New Yorkers of the time in July, 1945, when an Army B-25 bomber hit the north side of the Empire State Building at the seventy-ninth floor, caused a major fire and explosion, killed 14 people and left many others injured. The fire was extinguished, the debris was removed and the building was repaired. It did not collapse. In fact the structural integrity of the building was not affected.
“One of the common questions that has puzzled many independent observers was how jet fuel, which burns in open air at about 300 degrees Celsius, was able to compromise the integrity of steel, which melts at 1,000 degrees. The presence of depleted uranium at Ground Zero settles this conundrum.” Uranium burns at 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit, even without oxygen.
Kincaid also notes that the fires raged at ground zero for “a hundred days” after the attack. He said a high-energy compound like uranium will create an extended burn like this, while the jet fuel would have burned itself out within hours.
In his report, Kincaid theorizes that the plotters placed small nuclear devices deep under the elevator shafts in the World Trade Center. When detonated, the elevator shafts acted like chimneys, controlling the detonation and demolition, creating “a heat sink using the steel structure of the elevator shaft to cause the nuclear fission of the steel, to cause an implosion and to vent the intense heat and flash upward through the center of the building and out of view.”
The ground heat around the buildings was so intense it caused parked cars in all directions to ignite and burn. How could that have happened when the fire was located far above them?
Another interesting point to consider; first responders and witnesses that got too close to the disaster, and breathed the smoke and fumes, are still dying of a variety of cancers and lung problems that are identical to the issues that killed survivors of the U.S. bombings of Japan in World War II.
Why would our government attack our own buildings with nuclear weapons?
As suggested earlier in this story, it provided a reason for our military to go to war. War is a very profitable business for the nation’s military industrial complex.
There were other factors. Some might remember that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld revealed on September 10, one day prior to the attack, that over 2 trillion dollars of the Pentagon’s budget were unaccounted for. We have heard that the section of the Pentagon building that was struck by a “ghost” aircraft (that was never photographed and supposedly expertly flown by a young inexperienced pilot) happened to be the budget offices where this missing money might have been traced.
There also was a big brew-ha-ha going on in the nation over the botched Bush-Gore presidential election. The Supreme Court ended up putting Bush in office rather than wait for a recount of the ballots in Florida where Jeb Bush, the brother of George, was serving as governor. The final election tally was so close that a challenge over a possible fraudulent count could have played a key role in winning the presidency.
Some major U.S. newspapers, the New York Times, the Miami Herald and others were in the process of financing a recount of the Florida vote when 9-11 occurred. We never heard about it again. To this day a lot of Americans believe George Bush stole that election.
Within weeks after 9-11 the Patriot Act, which stripped Americans of many of their rights for private communication, was overwhelmingly approved by the House and Senate. It was a thick document that did a lot of damage to Constitutional rights. Most of our legislators later confessed that they never bothered to read it. It was obvious that the document was written and carefully planned long before 9-11 occurred. Someone was waiting for the right time to introduce it to the House and Senate.
The Patriot Act is still on the books.
By James Donahue
The public reaction and battery of media-driven propaganda that followed the 9-11 attacks were so powerful that those of us who doubted the story didn’t dare speak out for fear of being deemed “one of them.”
We had our doubts even as we watched the twin towers and then building seven come crashing down. There was mass confusion. What we were watching clearly appeared to us as a professional “implosion” that had nothing to do with the aircraft that struck them. But we didn't start putting the pieces together until much later after professional engineers began studying the images.
I began expressing myself on my old website then hosted by Yahoo and paid dearly for daring to question the government’s official story. Yahoo web engineers shut me out of my site and forced me to find a new host and start over. There was no way for me to prove the politics behind the shut-out, but it happened. That is how sensitive the emotions among the American people were during the weeks and months that followed that dreadful attack.
To this day most people in the U.S. are finding it hard to accept the mounting evidence that 9-11 might have been an inside red flag job designed to turn our heads from some very questionable events going on in Washington and the Pentagon and give the Bush Administration the excuse to launch two ugly (but very profitable) wars in the Middle East.
Like the events surrounding the 1963 Kennedy Assassination the conspiracy theories concerning the 9-11 attacks have been so common and the government response so silent that most Americans stand confused and uncertain about what to really believe. In both cases we had internal government sanctioned “investigations” that drafted official reports as to what happened. And a large number of folks have subsequently reached a point where they wonder if they can trust anything their government tells them.
For example, I remember watching a televised news story and watching a video clip of what they told us was Osama bin Laden, the so-called leader of an al-Qaeda network of trained Islamic terrorists, claiming responsibility for the September 11 attacks. If you “Google” search bin Laden you can easily find reports that he confessed to planning and ordering the attacks. But in the video we were shown bin Laden was sitting at some wilderness bunker, speaking in his own language, and a U.S. news reporter was interpreting what he was allegedly saying. People who have since studied the video now say the man in the picture was someone that looked like bin Laden but was not the real guerrilla leader. Some say bin Laden actually denied any links with the U.S. attack, and he did this several times. There appears to be no official record proving that bin Laden or his trained terrorist organization had anything to do with the 9-11 attacks.
Yet it was that confession that supported George W. Bush’s terrible decision to order a military strike against Afghanistan. Just over a year later Bush ordered another assault against Iraq.
Neither war was justified. Osama bin Laden was a native of Saudi Arabia. The alleged pilots that flew the aircraft into the twin towers and the Pentagon on 9-11 were allegedly from Saudi Arabia. The attack was allegedly plotted in Kandahar, Afghanistan by a gang that had no apparent political affiliations with Afghanistan. A U.S. Navy Seal team allegedly found and killed bin Laden in his hideout in Abbottabad, Pakistan in 2011 and his body was conveniently dumped overboard at sea. For some yet unexplained reason U.S. troops attacked the entire country of Afghanistan after 9-11 and that war is still going on after over 14 years. We are apparently still at war there against the Taliban, a militant group that has had control over that country but as far as we can tell was not part of the al-Qaeda movement. At least from the start. Why?
The Bush war in Iraq turned out to be predicated on a lie. Mr. Bush and several key members of his cabinet all told us they had proof that Iraqi President Sadam Hussein was harboring “weapons of mass destruction.” Hussein denied the charge and in the end, it turned out that Hussein was right, the story was a fabricated lie. Hussein had no alliance with bin Laden and the al-Qaeda terrorists either. The Iraq war also continues and U.S. involvement cannot seem to end. After we captured and led Hussein to the gallows, the country fell into civil war. The U.S. invested heavily in Iraq and helped establish that country's now failing government. Our troops remain there on an "advisory" and defensive nature. We may never leave.
This commentary was inspired by a lengthy report by Paul Kincaid on Press Core. Kincaid states why he believes the 9-11 attacks were the planned work of our own government and that uranium powered underground detonations were used. http://presscore.ca/concrete-evidence-shows-us-government-nuked-new-york-city-on-911.html
Kincaid’s report explains in great detail why he believes this to be true. He points out that the aircraft that struck the towers were being remotely controlled from a ground tower, that we had the technology to remotely control and fly aircraft in 2001, and that the fuel in those planes would not have topple the towers. He points out that structural engineers from all over the world agree that it would have been impossible for an aircraft to have accomplished such a fete.
The story reminds New Yorkers of the time in July, 1945, when an Army B-25 bomber hit the north side of the Empire State Building at the seventy-ninth floor, caused a major fire and explosion, killed 14 people and left many others injured. The fire was extinguished, the debris was removed and the building was repaired. It did not collapse. In fact the structural integrity of the building was not affected.
“One of the common questions that has puzzled many independent observers was how jet fuel, which burns in open air at about 300 degrees Celsius, was able to compromise the integrity of steel, which melts at 1,000 degrees. The presence of depleted uranium at Ground Zero settles this conundrum.” Uranium burns at 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit, even without oxygen.
Kincaid also notes that the fires raged at ground zero for “a hundred days” after the attack. He said a high-energy compound like uranium will create an extended burn like this, while the jet fuel would have burned itself out within hours.
In his report, Kincaid theorizes that the plotters placed small nuclear devices deep under the elevator shafts in the World Trade Center. When detonated, the elevator shafts acted like chimneys, controlling the detonation and demolition, creating “a heat sink using the steel structure of the elevator shaft to cause the nuclear fission of the steel, to cause an implosion and to vent the intense heat and flash upward through the center of the building and out of view.”
The ground heat around the buildings was so intense it caused parked cars in all directions to ignite and burn. How could that have happened when the fire was located far above them?
Another interesting point to consider; first responders and witnesses that got too close to the disaster, and breathed the smoke and fumes, are still dying of a variety of cancers and lung problems that are identical to the issues that killed survivors of the U.S. bombings of Japan in World War II.
Why would our government attack our own buildings with nuclear weapons?
As suggested earlier in this story, it provided a reason for our military to go to war. War is a very profitable business for the nation’s military industrial complex.
There were other factors. Some might remember that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld revealed on September 10, one day prior to the attack, that over 2 trillion dollars of the Pentagon’s budget were unaccounted for. We have heard that the section of the Pentagon building that was struck by a “ghost” aircraft (that was never photographed and supposedly expertly flown by a young inexperienced pilot) happened to be the budget offices where this missing money might have been traced.
There also was a big brew-ha-ha going on in the nation over the botched Bush-Gore presidential election. The Supreme Court ended up putting Bush in office rather than wait for a recount of the ballots in Florida where Jeb Bush, the brother of George, was serving as governor. The final election tally was so close that a challenge over a possible fraudulent count could have played a key role in winning the presidency.
Some major U.S. newspapers, the New York Times, the Miami Herald and others were in the process of financing a recount of the Florida vote when 9-11 occurred. We never heard about it again. To this day a lot of Americans believe George Bush stole that election.
Within weeks after 9-11 the Patriot Act, which stripped Americans of many of their rights for private communication, was overwhelmingly approved by the House and Senate. It was a thick document that did a lot of damage to Constitutional rights. Most of our legislators later confessed that they never bothered to read it. It was obvious that the document was written and carefully planned long before 9-11 occurred. Someone was waiting for the right time to introduce it to the House and Senate.
The Patriot Act is still on the books.