Was Kennedy Killed By Greedy Bankers?
By James Donahue
There is a story circulating the web that suggests that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he was about to stop the Vietnam War and shut down U. S. relations with the Federal Reserve Bank.
The stories are coming from several sources, and are rarely linked. The report that Kennedy was about to pull the U.S. out of Vietnam just before he died is an old one, and appears to have been a well documented truth. Vice President Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy in the White House, reversed the Kennedy plan. He used a false flag event to expand the war instead of pulling our armed forces out.
Other than the knowledge that war is profitable for big business and that certain people get quite wealthy while we are at war, we couldn't easily connect this as a cause for the president's assassination.
The link with Kennedy's executive order 11110, which transfers the power of issuing money from the Federal Reserve to the Department of the Treasury and replacing Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates backed by stored silver bullion, puts a new spin on the story, however.
The two stories are connected because they involve wealth manufactured out of thin air, and Kennedy's attempt to put an end to it. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated after attempting to do something very similar in 1865, just over a century earlier.
The executive order involving the Federal Reserve was issued on June 4, 1963. His plan to withdraw troops from Vietnam over the following two years was made public on October 2, 1963. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963.
Both presidents were attempting to dismantle corrupt banking systems that were operated by mostly European bankers. Both were and remain in violation of the Constitution, which gives the power of making money to the Congress. Congress also is awarded the power of regulating the value of our money. The Constitution requires that our money is coined of gold or silver, and that paper bills, if used, must be backed by their printed value in gold or silver maintained in guarded government vaults.
In Lincoln's case, the Second Bank of the United States, an earlier version of the Federal Reserve which was owned and operated by the English Monarchy and the Bank of England, had been driven out of business under President Andrew Jackson's administration in 1832. The bankers then began moving to regain their control on U.S. currency. The theory suggests that to accomplish this they decided to institute a civil war to drive the nation deep into debt. The following facts help support this theory:
The war began when Lincoln was in office. When Lincoln and his Secretary of the Treasury sought to borrow the money needed to fight the Union Army's side of the war, the bankers agreed but set the interest rates from 24 to 36 percent. Lincoln declined.
Instead, Lincoln went before Congress and got permission to create northern money. This was legal tender treasury notes that were known as green backs. Congress could do this because it is given this expressed right by the Constitution. Lincoln printed 450 million dollars in the new bills. The new money was not only well accepted, it worked so well that Lincoln was seriously considering adopting this currency as the nation's new money.
The London bankers were furious. They expressed their views in an article in the London Times which stated: "If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become underrated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."
To understand why that was such a threat to the Bank of England we must explain that the big secret behind the Federal Reserve and the old Second Bank of America was that both banking systems are owned by the British Crown and the House of Rothchild. This conglomerate has maintained control of the world's money since long before the American Revolution and is still doing it.
On Christmas Eve, 1913, while many members of Congress were home with their families for the holidays, a key number of congressmen met in special session in Washington to pass the Federal Reserve Act. This act was quickly signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson. Thus Congress passed control of the U. S. monetary system back over to the Bank of England once again. We are sure the members of Congress involved in this affair were well compensated.
Wilson explained his support of the creation of the Federal Reserve as a means of bringing more stability to our monetary system.
Also in 1913, our legislators instituted the federal income tax. Some people believe the federal income tax may be in violation of the Constitution. Every time this question has been legally challenged, however, the courts have backed up the tax. The tax was needed then, and still is needed to pay the interest on money borrowed from the Federal Reserve to keep the nation running.
Under the old system of green backs all of the nation's money was backed by gold or silver. The coins were made of gold and silver. There was no national debt because all of the money was backed by these valuable metals. Most of the gold was stored in vaults at Fort Knox, Kentucky.
Under the Federal Reserve, the money is printed on paper and literally created out of thin air. It has no cash value whatsoever. But it is then "loaned" to the U.S. government at perpetual interest that is paid by our tax dollars. The scam has kept the English crown and certain powerful bankers very wealthy, and created a mounting debt that threatens to eventually destroy the United States.
Did the Federal Reserve bring the stability to our monetary system as President Wilson allegedly thought? Indeed, it did not. We were quickly plunged into the First World War. By 1928 America and the world banking system was caught up by the Great Depression, largely because of reckless banking activities and continued printing of empty paper dollars.
While climbing out of the Great Depression and numerous “recessions” over the years, we have experienced a continuing decrease in the value of the dollar because of the Federal Reserve’s printing of more and more paper money than there was gold reserves to back up the value. This, in turn, has caused an inflationary spiral that has been slowly destroying the nation's capitalistic/industrial system.
This leads us to Kennedy's decision to issue his executive order which should have transferred the power from the Federal Reserve back to the United States Department of Treasury. It temporarily replaced Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates. For a brief period the nation saw such things as silver dollars and paper money backed by its printed value in silver bullion. All of this was stopped under the Johnson Administration.
U.S. banks today are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. There are usually postings on the doors and on lending documents that assure people that their money is backed up by the Federal Reserve. The statement appears to make us feel secure that our money in safe in that bank. What it really means is that when we borrow money to buy luxury items, like cars and houses, the money is "created from nothing" and electronically placed in our bank accounts with interest due. We pay monthly interest on that fake loaned money.
I once had a personal check written to me for several thousand dollars. I decided that I wanted to cash the check at my local bank. I was surprised when I was told the bank did not have that much cash in its vaults.
Thus the big question lies before us. Was the assassination of John F. Kennedy the work of the Queen of England and the Rothchild family? Some conspiracy theorists believe it might be what really happened. The Warren Commission that investigated the assassination may have uncovered the truth, but its members didn't dare open their mouths. Thus Lee Harvey Oswald took the fall for the bankers.
By James Donahue
There is a story circulating the web that suggests that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated because he was about to stop the Vietnam War and shut down U. S. relations with the Federal Reserve Bank.
The stories are coming from several sources, and are rarely linked. The report that Kennedy was about to pull the U.S. out of Vietnam just before he died is an old one, and appears to have been a well documented truth. Vice President Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy in the White House, reversed the Kennedy plan. He used a false flag event to expand the war instead of pulling our armed forces out.
Other than the knowledge that war is profitable for big business and that certain people get quite wealthy while we are at war, we couldn't easily connect this as a cause for the president's assassination.
The link with Kennedy's executive order 11110, which transfers the power of issuing money from the Federal Reserve to the Department of the Treasury and replacing Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates backed by stored silver bullion, puts a new spin on the story, however.
The two stories are connected because they involve wealth manufactured out of thin air, and Kennedy's attempt to put an end to it. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated after attempting to do something very similar in 1865, just over a century earlier.
The executive order involving the Federal Reserve was issued on June 4, 1963. His plan to withdraw troops from Vietnam over the following two years was made public on October 2, 1963. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, on November 22, 1963.
Both presidents were attempting to dismantle corrupt banking systems that were operated by mostly European bankers. Both were and remain in violation of the Constitution, which gives the power of making money to the Congress. Congress also is awarded the power of regulating the value of our money. The Constitution requires that our money is coined of gold or silver, and that paper bills, if used, must be backed by their printed value in gold or silver maintained in guarded government vaults.
In Lincoln's case, the Second Bank of the United States, an earlier version of the Federal Reserve which was owned and operated by the English Monarchy and the Bank of England, had been driven out of business under President Andrew Jackson's administration in 1832. The bankers then began moving to regain their control on U.S. currency. The theory suggests that to accomplish this they decided to institute a civil war to drive the nation deep into debt. The following facts help support this theory:
The war began when Lincoln was in office. When Lincoln and his Secretary of the Treasury sought to borrow the money needed to fight the Union Army's side of the war, the bankers agreed but set the interest rates from 24 to 36 percent. Lincoln declined.
Instead, Lincoln went before Congress and got permission to create northern money. This was legal tender treasury notes that were known as green backs. Congress could do this because it is given this expressed right by the Constitution. Lincoln printed 450 million dollars in the new bills. The new money was not only well accepted, it worked so well that Lincoln was seriously considering adopting this currency as the nation's new money.
The London bankers were furious. They expressed their views in an article in the London Times which stated: "If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall become underrated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."
To understand why that was such a threat to the Bank of England we must explain that the big secret behind the Federal Reserve and the old Second Bank of America was that both banking systems are owned by the British Crown and the House of Rothchild. This conglomerate has maintained control of the world's money since long before the American Revolution and is still doing it.
On Christmas Eve, 1913, while many members of Congress were home with their families for the holidays, a key number of congressmen met in special session in Washington to pass the Federal Reserve Act. This act was quickly signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson. Thus Congress passed control of the U. S. monetary system back over to the Bank of England once again. We are sure the members of Congress involved in this affair were well compensated.
Wilson explained his support of the creation of the Federal Reserve as a means of bringing more stability to our monetary system.
Also in 1913, our legislators instituted the federal income tax. Some people believe the federal income tax may be in violation of the Constitution. Every time this question has been legally challenged, however, the courts have backed up the tax. The tax was needed then, and still is needed to pay the interest on money borrowed from the Federal Reserve to keep the nation running.
Under the old system of green backs all of the nation's money was backed by gold or silver. The coins were made of gold and silver. There was no national debt because all of the money was backed by these valuable metals. Most of the gold was stored in vaults at Fort Knox, Kentucky.
Under the Federal Reserve, the money is printed on paper and literally created out of thin air. It has no cash value whatsoever. But it is then "loaned" to the U.S. government at perpetual interest that is paid by our tax dollars. The scam has kept the English crown and certain powerful bankers very wealthy, and created a mounting debt that threatens to eventually destroy the United States.
Did the Federal Reserve bring the stability to our monetary system as President Wilson allegedly thought? Indeed, it did not. We were quickly plunged into the First World War. By 1928 America and the world banking system was caught up by the Great Depression, largely because of reckless banking activities and continued printing of empty paper dollars.
While climbing out of the Great Depression and numerous “recessions” over the years, we have experienced a continuing decrease in the value of the dollar because of the Federal Reserve’s printing of more and more paper money than there was gold reserves to back up the value. This, in turn, has caused an inflationary spiral that has been slowly destroying the nation's capitalistic/industrial system.
This leads us to Kennedy's decision to issue his executive order which should have transferred the power from the Federal Reserve back to the United States Department of Treasury. It temporarily replaced Federal Reserve Notes with silver certificates. For a brief period the nation saw such things as silver dollars and paper money backed by its printed value in silver bullion. All of this was stopped under the Johnson Administration.
U.S. banks today are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. There are usually postings on the doors and on lending documents that assure people that their money is backed up by the Federal Reserve. The statement appears to make us feel secure that our money in safe in that bank. What it really means is that when we borrow money to buy luxury items, like cars and houses, the money is "created from nothing" and electronically placed in our bank accounts with interest due. We pay monthly interest on that fake loaned money.
I once had a personal check written to me for several thousand dollars. I decided that I wanted to cash the check at my local bank. I was surprised when I was told the bank did not have that much cash in its vaults.
Thus the big question lies before us. Was the assassination of John F. Kennedy the work of the Queen of England and the Rothchild family? Some conspiracy theorists believe it might be what really happened. The Warren Commission that investigated the assassination may have uncovered the truth, but its members didn't dare open their mouths. Thus Lee Harvey Oswald took the fall for the bankers.